23 November 2016

Art of Medicine, Unplugged

Dr. Robert Fowler, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
October 25, 2016

Posted by Nadine Abdullah, MD, MEd, FRCPC




Unplugged medicine: meaning intimate, bare, without extra accompaniments, where the art of the physical exam supersedes limited technological resources. In his compelling manner, Dr. Fowler walked us through his journey, from First World critical care where the art of medicine often falls off to the reliance on machines and numbers, down unexpected paths.

He first experienced working in an outbreak during SARS in Toronto, and at the time made connections with colleagues who were experiencing similar outbreaks elsewhere. A network of clinical researchers was born that would set the stage for international collaboration as globalization of disease grew. Not long after, he received calls from colleagues in other countries to help study their outbreaks; H1N1 in Mexico, MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia. He established himself as a leader in researching and managing outbreaks, and was sought out for his knowledge. This led to a sabbatical at the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva where his task was to review lessons learned from these past outbreaks, and to establish international standard protocols for future outbreaks. He employed the principles of clinical epidemiology to define acute respiratory illness outbreak terminology to improve the reporting of disease, and enhance global collaboration.

During his term, word came of a potential Ebola outbreak in West Africa, and he naturally traveled there with his colleague to see firsthand what was emerging. They found themselves immersed in providing clinical care and managing the outbreak. He described the makeshift setup of a hospital, transfer of sick health care staff, patients and rudimentary supplies from one hospital to this new centralized "facility" to provide ongoing care to the population. In the course of observing the evolution of this illness in individual patients, Dr. Fowler and his colleague noted the impact of dehydration on mortality, and began to institute aggressive IV hydration protocols, with point of care blood testing, oxygenation, and management of target organ damage. Despite limited resources, they began to collect formal data, and through careful documentation and analysis, demonstrated that they could see a 50% reduction in mortality with basic supportive medical care.  The unprecedented high mortality previously documented in Ebola was not simply the result of an inevitably fatal virulent disease, but due in large part to the consequent treatable dehydration, resultant metabolic derangement, shock and organ failure.

Early publication of their data in the New England Journal of Medicine led to widespread understanding of the disease and its management, and put Ebola on the radar of governments and agencies allowing them to recognize need and mobilize resources, eventually halting the outbreak.

Dr. Fowler and his colleague's work has set a new standard for live epidemiological research while simultaneously providing emergency medical care in a devastating outbreak. The individual patient and global population impact is measurable; the timeliness incomparable to the vast clinical research we pore over in medical journals. Their work will serve global health immensely when the next outbreak hits.

This talk was not merely a physician's biography and resume of academic achievements. It was a captivating narrative about the blending of science and humanistic medicine. It illustrated the impact of applying the science of clinical epidemiology to global health. When time was up, and groups lingered to talk more, the discussion turned to the practical personal impact and sacrifice, an intimate experience of leading care amidst a frightening health crisis, and returning to the comfort of a First World health care system. As with our last lecture on MAID by Dr. Gary Rodin, this talk exemplified how the Medical Expert role is inseparable from the intrinsic CanMEDS Roles, this time with a particular emphasis on the Collaborator, Leader and Scholar Roles. But it also had several take-home messages for the learners and junior faculty seeking mentorship and role models for career planning. Here are some lessons I took away:

1. Take advantage of the clinical experiences around you; they will prepare you to be a leader in future unexpected roles.
2. Take a sabbatical that will give you an opportunity to be part of a global collaboration. You might find yourself being the right person, in the right place, at the right time.
3. Get out of your comfort zone. It gives you new perspective from where you work.
4. Remember the importance of giving back. We have developed critical skills and knowledge that can impact the health of a broader, more vulnerable population than that we serve daily.

I wondered; do we spend enough time explicitly teaching and modelling these lessons as educators? Were the senior attending physicians present who had formerly taught and supervised Dr. Fowler thinking with pride that they might have contributed in small part to inspiring this passion? Were the students and residents inspired to think how their future careers would unfold?

A month later, the buzz lingers in the air. Inspired by this talk, what stories about their careers will they in turn be talking about in twenty years?

Bio – Rob Fowler, MD

Dr. Fowler is a General Internist and Critical Care Physician at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Adjunct Scientist at the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Associate Director of the Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research graduate program of the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation at the University of Toronto, and a senior Scientist at Sunnybrook Research Institute. He was a WHO consultant during the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. He has an active research program focused on clinical outcomes of critically ill patients, holds a number of peer-reviewed grants, and has published widely.  More recently, he was appointed to the Order of Ontario.



13 November 2016

Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID): Conversations about the Unspeakable

Dr. Gary Rodin, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network
September 29, 2016

Posted by Nadine Abdullah, MD, MEd, FRCPC





The last phrase in Dr. Richardson’s original description of this series, “complex clinical environments”, prompted a timely topic for our inaugural lecture this year: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). Our learners asked how to deal with a request from a patient for MAID. How do we approach this in our own practice, and how do we teach about it in medical education?

Our goal was to create a safe space, recognizing and respecting we each hold our own thoughts on MAID that we bring to the discussion. Given the reality of the current legislation enacted June 17, 2016 rendering MAID legal in Canada, provided certain conditions are met, the focus of our discussion was to move beyond moral and ethical debate, to engage and prepare for the challenges in conversations we will have in our duty to our patients. How do we do this?

Dr. Rodin led us briefly through an understanding of Canadian MAID legislation and the UHN protocol for context. He used a case based approach drawing on patients from his practice to highlight the types of conversations that we should be prepared to have.  He noted the analogy to patients requesting futile treatment, where similar motivations are at the root, being a desire for control and a sense of agency over the process of illness and death. Immediate attention should be made to ensuring we address present symptoms and consider alternatives to MAID, including pain control, discussing psychosocial aspects of despair, and ensuring access to comprehensive palliative/supportive care. If a desire remains, we need to ensure competence, lack of coercion, and persistence of a sustained value system.

Early experience with MAID in Canada has shown that a significant number of requests do not proceed after thoughtful conversations between patients and their physicians about their motivations, and supporting their complex needs. Dr. Rodin left us with a framework for a therapeutic approach to speaking with patients. We need not fear our patients asking for assistance dying, but embrace the conversations we can lead that remind us of our role in humanistic medicine. As Flegel and Patrick remind us, if we become more comfortable discussing death with our patients as part of our ordinary medical practice, conversations with patients about MAID will become less frightening CMAJ, 18(10).

As a medical educator, I experienced this talk as an informal interactive session where students, residents and attending physicians were engaged, eagerly asking difficult questions. In the discussion prompted by those questions, I saw a contextualization of our CanMEDS Roles. To have these conversations, we need a solid foundation as a Medical Expert, while simultaneously enacting our intrinsic roles of Communicator, Collaborator, Health advocate, Leader, and Professional. But did the students and residents see this? Do we need to explicitly label the CanMEDS Roles in this teaching format in order for learners to see and incorporate them? Would that enhance and reinforce the learning, or interfere with the organic nature of this format? Did the involvement of attendings in the audience impact the outcome in a shared learning environment? We are interested in your thoughts, as we look to answer these questions over the year.

Bio - Gary Rodin MD

Gary Rodin is the University of Toronto/University Health Network Chair in Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care and Head of the Department of Supportive Care at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada. Dr. Rodin is also the Director of the Global Institute of Psychosocial, Palliative and End-of-Life Care (GIPPEC) and a Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Toronto.  He leads a clinical and research program on the psychosocial dimensions of advanced and terminal disease and on the development and evaluation of novel interventions to improve the quality of life and the quality of dying and death in this population.   He has published widely in these areas and is recognized internationally for his efforts to improve the rigor of research and the effectiveness and availability of psychosocial and palliative interventions. He is a key leader in the development of MAID guidelines for UHN.


Resources:

Canadian physicians are encouraged to consult with their provincial regulatory college and Canadian Medical Protective Agency (CMPA) in cases of discomfort addressing MAID, maintaining the right of conscientious objection, and if proceeding with MAID referral.


CMPA policy 2016

CanMEDS Framework

Flegel K and Patrick K. Discussing death with the livingCanadian Medical Association Journal 188(10) · May 2016